Gaza’s Farmers Return to Fields That War Left in Ruin
Agriculture has sustained Palestinian life in Gaza for generations — a thin coastal strip of land where families cultivated olive groves, citrus orchards, wheat fields and vegetable plots against the backdrop of one of the world’s most densely populated territories. More than a year into the large-scale military campaign that international and UN bodies have subjected to intense legal scrutiny, Gaza’s agricultural sector has been reduced to near-total destruction. With 96 percent of farmland reported destroyed, the farmers who are now beginning to return face not simply damaged fields but landscapes buried in rubble and seeded with unexploded ordnance — and a continuing Israeli blockade that is blocking the inputs they need to rebuild.
The Scale of Agricultural Destruction
The figure at the centre of any account of Gaza’s farming crisis is staggering in its breadth: 96 percent of Gaza’s farmland destroyed. That near-total erasure means that the foundation of local food production — the soil, the irrigation infrastructure, the trees, the storage facilities, the equipment — has been wiped away across virtually the entire territory. What remains is not damaged farmland awaiting repair but ground that must first be made safe. Unexploded ordnance buried across fields poses lethal risk to any farmer who attempts to return and work the land, turning the act of ploughing or planting into a potentially fatal undertaking. The rubble of destroyed farm structures adds a further physical barrier to recovery, requiring clearance before cultivation can resume.
Gaza’s agricultural sector was never operating under normal conditions even before the current conflict. Decades of blockade, restrictions on the movement of goods, and recurring cycles of military escalation had already compressed the territory’s capacity to feed itself. The near-complete destruction documented now represents the elimination of what remained.
The Blockade as a Second Wall
Even where farmers have the will and the physical means to attempt recovery, Israel’s blockade is described as making that recovery nearly impossible. Agricultural reconstruction requires seeds, fertiliser, pesticides, irrigation equipment, spare parts and fuel — almost all of which depend on external supply chains. A blockade that controls what enters Gaza by land, sea and air has the capacity to stop agricultural recovery before it begins, regardless of how much human effort is invested in the fields themselves.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which monitors the humanitarian situation in the occupied Palestinian territory, has repeatedly documented the impact of access restrictions on Gaza’s ability to receive not only food aid but also the productive inputs that would allow the population to grow its own food. The blockade’s effect on agriculture is therefore dual: it restricts food coming in, and it restricts the means to produce food locally.
What Human Rights Monitors Have Documented
The destruction of agricultural land and food systems in the context of armed conflict is subject to scrutiny under international humanitarian law, which prohibits attacks on objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, including foodstuffs, agricultural areas and crops. Organisations including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Al-Haq and the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor have reported extensively on the destruction of civilian infrastructure in Gaza, including food production capacity. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in proceedings brought by South Africa, has addressed questions of potential violations of the Genocide Convention, adding a formal legal dimension to international concern about conditions in the territory.
The deliberate or indiscriminate destruction of farmland at this scale, combined with a blockade that prevents reconstruction, has led multiple monitoring bodies to characterise conditions in Gaza as constituting a man-made famine — a conclusion that frames the agricultural crisis not as collateral damage but as a foreseeable and documented outcome of policy.
What Recovery Looks Like — and What It Requires
The farmers returning to Gaza’s ruined fields are doing so in conditions that make the word « recovery » almost abstract. Before a seed can be planted, land must be cleared of ordnance by trained de-miners. Before irrigation can function, pipes and pumps destroyed by bombardment must be replaced. Before a harvest can be stored, the cold-storage and warehouse infrastructure that no longer exists must be rebuilt. All of this requires materials, equipment and expertise that the blockade is preventing from entering in adequate quantities.
The effort these farmers are making is documented not as a story of success but as a story of determination in the face of structural obstruction — people returning to land that defined their families and their economy, confronting the full weight of what has been taken from them.
Gaza’s agricultural recovery cannot be separated from the political and military conditions that produced its destruction. As long as the blockade remains in place and unexploded ordnance goes uncleared, the 96 percent figure will function less as a measurement of past damage and more as a ceiling on what the future can hold. The farmers beginning that work deserve to be seen clearly — and the barriers placed in their path documented with equal clarity.
—
