olivewire.org

Gaza’s Fishing Industry: Before and After the Blockade

On the Gaza waterfront at dawn, the smell of salt and diesel once announced a working port. Men hauled nets, sorted catches by lantern light, and argued over prices before the sun cleared the horizon. Fishing was not simply an industry here — it was a way of life inherited across generations, one of the few economic anchors in a territory hemmed in on every side. Then came the blockade, the shrinking sea, and the gunboats. What remains today is a shadow of what once was.

A Livelihood Built on the Mediterranean

Before Israel imposed its comprehensive blockade on Gaza in June 2007 — tightened progressively after Hamas took administrative control of the Strip — the fishing sector supported an estimated 3,500 licensed fishermen, with tens of thousands more dependent on the industry through fish processing, boat repair, net-making, and market trade, according to figures documented by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and OCHA oPt. The Oslo Accords’ Gaza-Jericho Agreement of 1994 had nominally granted Palestinian fishermen access to a 20-nautical-mile fishing zone off Gaza’s coast. In practice that limit was rarely fully honored, but fishermen could reach deeper, more abundant waters — sardines, sea bream, grouper — that sustained both family tables and commercial sales.

Gaza’s 40-kilometer coastline along the Mediterranean was, in the words of Raji Sourani of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, one of the territory’s last genuinely productive natural resources. The sea could not be confiscated the way land could. Or so it seemed.

How the Fishing Zone Became a Cage

The blockade fundamentally reordered Gaza’s relationship with the sea. Israel unilaterally imposed access limits that bore no relationship to the Oslo-agreed 20 nautical miles. By 2009, in the aftermath of Operation Cast Lead, the permitted zone had been reduced to 3 nautical miles. At various points it was cut further still — to 6, then back to 3, then briefly to 0 during military escalations — fluctuating according to Israeli security declarations rather than any legal or humanitarian framework.

OCHA oPt has tracked these restrictions systematically for years. In its reporting, the office noted that the 3-nautical-mile limit confines fishermen to shallow, heavily overfished coastal waters where catches are a fraction of what deeper Mediterranean waters yield. The FAO estimated that restricting access to 3 nautical miles cuts fishermen off from roughly 85 percent of Gaza’s maritime space as defined under the Oslo framework. What is left is an impoverished, depleted strip of water shared by hundreds of boats.

The consequences for income were immediate and severe. Average catches collapsed. A fisherman who might once have brought in several hundred kilograms of diverse fish per trip found himself returning with far less, from shallower grounds, at greater personal risk. OCHA data from multiple reporting years shows that fish production in Gaza fell from roughly 3,000–4,000 tonnes annually in the early 2000s to lows of under 2,000 tonnes in years of tightest restriction — figures that track almost directly with changes in the permitted nautical zone.

Israeli Navy Enforcement and the Destruction of Boats

Restrictions on paper are one thing. Enforcement at sea is another. The Israeli navy has enforced the fishing limit through live fire, water cannons, arrest, and the confiscation and destruction of fishing vessels. The Gaza-based human rights organization Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights has documented these incidents in detail over many years. Its case files record fishermen shot and wounded while operating within the declared limit, boats raked with gunfire, and nets destroyed during Israeli naval operations.

Between 2010 and 2020, Al-Mezan documented dozens of incidents in which fishermen were killed or injured, and scores of cases involving boat confiscation or destruction. The pattern is consistent: fishermen approach or are perceived to approach the edge of the permitted zone; Israeli naval vessels open fire or ram boats; fishermen are sometimes arrested and held in Israeli detention before being returned to Gaza, sometimes without their vessels.

The economic damage from vessel destruction is compounding. A functional fishing boat represents a family’s entire productive capital — often bought through years of savings or collective family debt. When a boat is confiscated or sunk, there is no insurance, no government compensation, and no credit market accessible to Gaza’s fishermen under blockade conditions. Al-Mezan’s documentation shows that many affected families exit the fishing sector entirely, unable to replace destroyed equipment.

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have both cited the firing on Gaza fishermen as a serious pattern warranting investigation. The ICRC has also raised the issue of civilian access to maritime livelihoods within the framework of international humanitarian law obligations applicable to the occupation.

Sea Pollution: The Sewage Crisis Beneath the Surface

Even in waters fishermen are permitted to reach, what they find is increasingly compromised. Gaza’s sewage infrastructure — battered by successive military operations, starved of construction materials under the blockade, and deprived of the fuel needed to run treatment facilities — has for years discharged partially treated or raw sewage directly into the Mediterranean. OCHA oPt and the Palestinian Water Authority have both reported that tens of millions of liters of sewage enter the sea daily along Gaza’s coast.

The environmental consequences for fishing are direct. WHO and UNICEF have flagged the health risks associated with fish caught in contaminated nearshore waters. The very coastal zone to which fishermen have been confined — 3 nautical miles — is also the zone most heavily affected by sewage outflow. Fishermen are thus caught in a cruel geometry: pushed into shallow waters by naval enforcement, and finding those same waters degraded by a sewage crisis that is itself a product of the blockade’s restrictions on reconstruction materials and fuel imports.

UNCTAD’s reporting on Gaza’s economy has described the fishing sector as emblematic of a broader pattern of “de-development” — the systematic dismantling of productive capacity that leaves a population increasingly unable to sustain itself.

What Has Been Lost

The numbers — catch volumes, boat counts, income figures — can only partially capture what the collapse of Gaza’s fishing industry has meant. It has meant the end of occupational identity for thousands of men whose grandfathers fished the same waters. It has meant protein insecurity in a territory where food import dependency is near total. It has meant the silencing of a waterfront that was once genuinely alive.

The fishermen who remain do so against extraordinary odds — navigating a sea that has been legally narrowed, physically degraded, and enforced by gunboats. Their persistence is a form of resistance as much as it is livelihood. But persistence does not restore what has been taken.

Sources

Étiqueté , , , , ,

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *