olivewire.org

The 2008–2009 Gaza War (Cast Lead): Casualties, Destruction, Goldstone Report

At 11:30 in the morning on 27 December 2008, Israeli aircraft struck more than 100 targets across the Gaza Strip in the space of less than four minutes. In a single opening salvo, at least 140 Palestinians were killed — many of them police cadets attending a graduation ceremony at a training compound in Gaza City. It was the bloodiest single day in Gaza in decades, and it was only the beginning. Over the next 22 days, Operation Cast Lead would kill more than 1,400 Palestinians, wound thousands more, and reduce entire neighbourhoods to rubble, producing a body of documented evidence of serious violations of international humanitarian law that would eventually reach the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The Scale of Palestinian Deaths and Injuries

The question of how many Palestinians died during Cast Lead was never seriously in dispute, even if Israeli officials contested the breakdown by combatant status. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), which conducted name-by-name field documentation in the weeks and months after the offensive ended on 18 January 2009, recorded 1,417 Palestinians killed. Of those, PCHR identified 926 as civilians, including 313 children and 116 women. The Israeli human rights organisation B’Tselem reached a broadly consistent figure of 1,391 Palestinian deaths, of whom it classified 759 as civilians who took no part in the hostilities, including 344 minors.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA oPt) documented the destruction of approximately 3,540 housing units and severe damage to around 2,870 more. Roughly 50,800 Palestinians were displaced. The UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) reported that its own installations — schools and distribution centres sheltering civilians who had fled combat zones — were struck on multiple occasions. Thirteen Israelis were also killed during the offensive, ten of them soldiers, three civilians — a toll that Israeli officials cited to underline their own losses, but which, in the arithmetic of the conflict, underscored the profound asymmetry in lethality.

Gaza’s medical system was pushed to collapse within days. The World Health Organisation reported that hospitals already operating under the long-running Israeli-Egyptian blockade — which had constrained the entry of medicines, fuel, and equipment since 2007 — were overwhelmed with casualties at the precise moment their supply chains were most disrupted. The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics later estimated that the offensive caused direct economic losses exceeding $1.4 billion, in a territory where per-capita GDP had already been shrinking for years under the blockade that UNCTAD had documented as causing severe de-development.

White Phosphorus Over Al-Quds Hospital and the UNRWA Compound

Among the specific incidents that would receive the most sustained international legal scrutiny was Israel’s repeated use of white phosphorus artillery shells over densely populated civilian areas — a munition that ignites on contact with oxygen and burns at temperatures reaching 800°C, causing deep, slow-healing wounds that are extraordinarily difficult to treat.

On 15 January 2009, white phosphorus shells struck the Al-Quds hospital in the Tel al-Hawa neighbourhood of Gaza City, starting fires that forced the evacuation of patients and medical staff and destroyed part of the facility. The Palestine Red Crescent Society, which operated the hospital, documented the strikes in real time. Human Rights Watch, whose researchers were able to enter Gaza after the ceasefire and conduct on-the-ground forensic investigation, published detailed findings in March 2009 confirming that 155mm white phosphorus artillery shells — of a type manufactured in the United States — had been fired into the hospital complex. The organisation concluded that the attack violated the laws of war.

The following day, 16 January, white phosphorus shells hit the UNRWA headquarters compound in Gaza City, where the agency had been coordinating the distribution of humanitarian aid and sheltering civilians. Fires destroyed approximately 500 tonnes of food aid and a fuel depot. UNRWA Commissioner-General Karen AbuZayd condemned the attack publicly while it was still burning. Human Rights Watch again documented the use of white phosphorus at the site, and UNRWA itself provided photographic and physical evidence. Israel initially denied using white phosphorus in populated areas before eventually acknowledging its use and ordering an internal military inquiry — one that critics, including Amnesty International, described as inadequate and lacking independence.

The UN Fact-Finding Mission and the Goldstone Report

In April 2009, the UN Human Rights Council mandated a fact-finding mission to investigate violations of international humanitarian and human rights law during the conflict. The mission was chaired by Richard Goldstone, a South African jurist and former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda — credentials that gave the exercise a degree of legal authority that was difficult to dismiss on procedural grounds.

The Goldstone Report, formally the Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (UN document A/HRC/12/48), was published in September 2009. It ran to 575 pages and examined 36 specific incidents in detail. Its core findings were stark. The mission concluded that Israeli forces had committed actions “amounting to war crimes, and possibly crimes against humanity”, including:

The report also found that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups had committed violations of international humanitarian law — including the firing of rockets toward Israeli civilian areas — and called for accountability on both sides. Israel refused to cooperate with the mission. The Palestinian Authority cooperated; Hamas did not fully engage.

In April 2011, Richard Goldstone published an op-ed in The Washington Post in which he said that, had he known then what had since emerged from Israeli investigations, the report “would have been a different document” — specifically on the question of whether Israel had deliberately targeted civilians as a matter of policy. The retraction, partial and contested even by Goldstone’s co-authors on the mission (Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin, and Desmond Travers all issued a statement affirming the report’s findings in full), was seized upon by Israeli officials and their supporters as a comprehensive repudiation. It was not: the documented facts of specific incidents — the white phosphorus attacks on the hospital and the UNRWA compound, the civilian death toll, the infrastructure destruction — were never retracted and remain in the UN record.

International Law and the Question of Accountability

The Goldstone Report called on both Israel and Palestinian authorities to conduct credible, independent investigations meeting international standards, and gave them six months to do so before the matter might be referred to the International Criminal Court. Neither set of investigations satisfied international observers. Amnesty International, in its own independent report Operation ‘Cast Lead’: 22 Days of Death and Destruction (2009), documented unlawful killings, the use of human shields, and the collective punishment inherent in the ongoing blockade of Gaza — noting that the blockade itself, maintained before, during, and after the offensive, constituted a violation of Israel’s obligations as an occupying power under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

The legal framework governing the conduct of hostilities — the distinction between civilians and combatants, the principle of proportionality, the prohibition on attacks on protected sites including hospitals and humanitarian facilities — was not invented for Gaza. It was codified across decades of international humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols. What Cast Lead demonstrated, in the documentation assembled by PCHR, B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, UNRWA, and the UN Fact-Finding Mission itself, was the persistent and lethal distance between those legal obligations and what actually happened to Palestinian civilians in 22 days of winter in 2008 and 2009.

For the families of 313 children, no report closed that distance.

Sources

Étiqueté , , , , ,

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *